When I think about me and simulate you: Medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes
Introduction
An important feature of human experience is to conceive of the self as a more or less coherent entity that persists across time (Gallagher, 2000, Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000). Therefore, one is capable of attributing personality traits to oneself or to identify recollected episodes as memories of one's past. These are examples of self-referential processing. That is, in both cases, the processing subject (i.e., the self) refers to itself.
In recent years, the medial rostral prefrontal cortex (mrPFC; approximating medial aspects of Area 10) has been implicated in a variety of tasks thought to require self-referential processing (Northoff et al., 2006). Some of these asked participants to judge whether personality trait words are descriptive of oneself, and mrPFC activation was stronger when traits were deemed to be more self-relevant (Macrae et al., 2004, Moran et al., 2006). Furthermore, this region tends to be more strongly activated during such judgments about oneself than about either close friends (D'Argembeau et al., 2007, Heatherton et al., 2006) or famous others (Kelley et al., 2002, D'Argembeau et al., 2005).
Though these studies compellingly link mrPFC with self-referential processing, this region is not exclusively recruited while thinking about oneself. In fact, there is some evidence for comparable activation during trait attributions about either oneself or other people (Ochsner et al., 2005, Schmitz et al., 2004). Therefore, a goal of the present study was to characterize the degree to which mrPFC might also be involved in appraising others. Specifically, predictions from simulation theory were tested: this account posits that one can make inferences about others by referring to knowledge about oneself (Gallese and Goldman, 1998, Frith and Frith, 1999, Mitchell et al., 2005). For example, one could use one's thoughts and feelings to extrapolate what another person might think and feel. Such a strategy, however, is only valid in so far as the self is a good model of the other person. That is, one has to assume that this person is reasonably similar to oneself. In such cases, self-referential processes subserved by mrPFC might also be involved in trait judgments about others (Mitchell et al., 2005). Consistent with this idea, Mitchell et al. (2006) reported more similar activation of this region during mental state inferences about oneself and an unknown person, if this unknown person was thought of as more politically like-minded.
The present study tested whether mrPFC is also more strongly engaged during trait judgments about personally known others in cases of greater perceived similarity. Moreover, we hypothesized that recruiting self-referential processes for similar others may impact on performance on a subsequent episodic source memory task: if trait attributions about the self and a similar friend are subserved by common processes, these shared encoding operations might yield overlapping memory representations for both judgment types (Mashek et al., 2003, Tulving and Thomson, 1973). Hence, remembering the reference of the judgments was expected to be more difficult in case of greater similarity.
The episodic memory task further served the second goal of this study: an integral part of remembering an episode from one's past is the feeling that this memory refers to oneself (Tulving, 2002). Yet, this sense can differ between conditions, and mrPFC has been especially associated with the recollection of memories that entail a pronounced self-referential component (Cabeza et al., 2004, Simons et al., 2008). For example, Hassabis et al. (2007) contrasted recollection of autobiographical experiences and of previously imagined, fictional experiences. Whereas both conditions similarly recruited a widespread network, recollection of autobiographical episodes yielded stronger mrPFC activation. The authors argued that both tasks involved a common process of scene construction. Selective mrPFC recruitment for autobiographical events, in contrast, was proposed to reflect greater self-referential processing of these real-life memories.
To date, the link between activation in this region during episodic memory retrieval and self-referential processing is primarily supported by studies such as those investigating trait judgments (but see also Summerfield et al., 2009). The present study allowed for a more direct test of this account: if mrPFC activation reflects the great self-referential component of recalled memories, this area should also be involved in the successful retrieval of trait judgments about oneself. Moreover, consistent with simulation theory, this region should further be recruited during the successful retrieval of trait judgments about others to the degree that the other person is perceived as similar.
The only two previous neuroimaging studies on the retrieval of self-referential trait judgments indeed observed mrPFC activation (Fossati et al., 2004, Lou et al., 2004). In both cases, however, the task used to probe memory did not require any recollection of the actual study episodes (Yonelinas, 2001). Thus, they did not assess whether recruitment of mrPFC was specifically associated with the successful retrieval of self-related information.
Taken together, the present study investigated the contribution of mrPFC to self and other trait judgments and to their subsequent retrieval from memory. Two factors were crossed: (i) the requirement to engage in personality trait or episodic memory judgments and (ii) the reference for these judgments (i.e., oneself or a friend). Specifically, participants alternated between study and test phases, while being scanned by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During study, they judged the degree to which personality trait words were descriptive of either themselves (self study condition) or a close friend (other study condition). In a non-semantic control condition, they specified the number of the words' syllables (syllables study condition). During test, traits were presented that comprised words studied in all conditions plus new words. In the self test condition, participants indicated whether they had judged themselves with these traits. Thus, this condition required retrieval of self-referential information. In the other test condition, in contrast, they indicated whether they had previously made a judgment with reference to their friend. Accordingly, in the syllables test condition participants decided whether they had performed the syllables task. Finally, the perceived similarity to the friend was assessed.
This design addressed the two hypotheses. First, if self-referential processes are more strongly engaged for trait judgments about more similar others, three findings were predicted: foremost, any difference in mrPFC activation between the self and other study condition should be smaller for those participants who perceive their respective friend as more alike. Furthermore, due to shared encoding operations, it should be more difficult to correctly remember the reference of trait judgments about oneself and a more similar other person. Finally, areas specifically implicated in retrieving self-referential information should be more strongly recruited while retrieving judgments about others in cases of greater similarity. This prediction is further specified by the second hypothesis: mrPFC activation is expected for successful retrieval of self-referential information.
Section snippets
Participants
Sixteen volunteers participated in this experiment. They were all right-handed, had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and reported good health with no known history of neurological or psychiatric illness. Prior to the experimental session, they gave written informed consent. All participants received £15 reimbursement as approved by the local research ethics committee. Three participants had to be excluded from further analysis either due to chance performance (2) or technical problems (1).
Self–other similarity
The duration that participants knew each other was variable, ranging from 9 months to 23 years (median: 84 months). Pearson correlation coefficients between self and other judgments were positive except for two participants (median r: 0.43, range: − 0.33–0.76). This similarity measure was not significantly correlated with the duration of the friendship (Spearman's ρ: − 0.33, p = 0.271).
Study phase
Response times appeared to be shorter for trait than for syllable judgments (Table 1), though the effect was only
Discussion
Two issues were addressed in this study. First, we examined whether mrPFC is differentially engaged during judgments about personality characteristics of similar versus dissimilar others (Mitchell et al., 2006). Importantly, this study additionally investigated whether recruiting self-referential processes for thinking about others might influence subsequent source memory performance. Second, we investigated whether mrPFC is also activated during the successful retrieval of self-referential
Summary and conclusions
MrPFC was activated during appraisal of one's personality traits as well as during subsequent retrieval of those judgments. Crucially, the degree to which this area was also activated while processing others correlated with the degree of perceived similarity. Thus, the data support simulation accounts which posit that self-referential processes are also employed for thinking about another person, if one assumes oneself to be a good model of this person. Moreover, recruiting similar processes
Acknowledgments
We thank the Birkbeck-UCL Centre for NeuroImaging for the support of our study and especially Dr. Fred Dick for his assistance in setting up the scanning parameters.
References (65)
- et al.
Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography
Neuropsychologia
(2001) - et al.
The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning
NeuroImage
(2001) - et al.
Self-referential reflective activity and its relationship with rest: a PET study
NeuroImage
(2005) - et al.
Distributed self in episodic memory: neural correlates of successful retrieval of self-encoded positive and negative personality traits
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications
NeuroImage
(2002) Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2000)- et al.
Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(1998) - et al.
Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain
Neuropsychologia
(2006)
Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others
Neuron
Self-referential processing in our brain—a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
NeuroImage
The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge
NeuroImage
Retrieval processing and episodic memory
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Metacognitive evaluation, self-relevance, and the right prefrontal cortex
NeuroImage
The resting brain and our self: self-relatedness modulates resting state neural activity in cortical midline structures
Neuroscience
Anterior prefrontal cortex and the recollection of contextual information
Neuropsychologia
Discriminating imagined from perceived information engages brain areas implicated in schizophrenia
NeuroImage
Cortical midline involvement in autobiographical memory
NeuroImage
Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where”
Neuropsychologia
Distinct roles for lateral and medial rostral prefrontal cortex in source monitoring of perceived and imagined events
Neuropsychologia
Brain activation patterns during memory of cognitive agency
NeuroImage
The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research
J.f Mem. Lang.
Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation
NeuroImage
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Confabulation and the control of recollection
Memory
Function and localization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Brain activity during episodic retrieval of autobiographical and laboratory events: an fMRI study using a novel photo paradigm
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Psychol. Rev.
Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration
J. Comp. Neurol.
Self-reflection across time: cortical midline structures differentiate between present and past selves
Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.
Cited by (99)
Relation between frontal pole volumes and cognitive insight in Schizophrenia
2022, Asian Journal of PsychiatryNeural correlates of self- and other-referential processing in young adolescents and the effects of testosterone and peer similarity
2020, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Based on both studies in adults (Denny et al., 2012; Murray et al., 2012; Northoff et al., 2006; Schurz et al., 2014; Van Buuren et al., 2010) as well as studies in adolescents (Pfeifer et al., 2013, 2009; Romund et al., 2017) on self- and other-referential processing, we focus on the vMPFC, dMPFC, TPJ and PCC as a priori defined regions-of-interest. We hypothesize that the vMPFC, PCC and TPJ will show an effect of reference, and in addition expect the vMPFC to show a decrease in activity from evaluating the similar to the dissimilar other (Benoit et al., 2010; Krienen et al., 2010; Romund et al., 2017). Additionally, we investigate functional connectivity by examining interactions of the vMPFC during self- and other-referential processing, however we do not have specific hypotheses regarding the emerging connectivity patterns due to the novelty of this study aim.
Brain default-mode network dysfunction in addiction
2019, NeuroImage