Skip to main content

Introduction: Contending Views—Militarism, Militarization and War

  • Chapter
  • 248 Accesses

Part of the book series: Initiatives in Strategic Studies: Issues and Policies ((ISSIP))

Abstract

Traditional militarization theory argues that as the armed forces increase their influence in government, because of an increase in their capabilities, the state becomes more likely to adopt an aggressive foreign policy that can lead to war.1 “... [T]he presence of military capabilities means participation in decision making by officials responsible for those capabilities, who are likely to urge or endorse the use of force and who regard it as a proper and feasible step.”2 According to Stuart Bremer, “the militarization of a society may cause leaders and followers alike to conclude that war is inevitable rather than merely possible.”3 The conventional wisdom, at least, is that military leaders are more likely to endorse war mainly because they are more familiar with that policy instrument. They tend to be alarmist and rely on offensive military solutions.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Books

  • Andreski, Stanislav, Military Organization and Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Assensoh, A. B., and Yvette M. Alex-Assensoh, African Military History and Politics (New York: Palgrave, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, Deborah, Political Institutions and Military Change—Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghahn, Volker, Militarism: The History of an International Debate, 1861–1979 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Richard, Soldier, Statesmen, and Cold War Crises (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, Jurgen, and J. Paul Dunne, eds., Arming the South (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, Lyman, Louis Finkelstein, and R. Maclver, eds., Perspectives on a Troubled Decade: Science, Philosophy and Religion, 1939–1949 (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caforio, Giuseppe, ed., Handbook of the Sociology of the Military (New York: Kluwer, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James, Civil-Military Dynamics, Democracy and International Conflict (New York: Palgrave, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Eliot, Supreme Command (New York: Free Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, Marie-France, Rethinking Confidence-Building Measures: Adelphi Paper 307 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eban, Abba, Personal Witness—Israel Through My Eyes (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Everts, Philip, Democracy and Military Force (Chippenham: Palgrave, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feaver, Peter, and Christopher Gelpi, Choosing Tour Battles (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Christina, Living Silence—Burma under Military Rule (Bangkok: White Lotus, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, Daniel, and J. David Singer, Nations at War—A Scientific Study of International Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Felix, ed., The Historical Essays of Otto Hintze (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Colin, Weapons Don’t Make War—Policy, Strategy, and Military Technology (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, Fred, and Nelson Polsby, eds., Strategies of Inquiry—Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7 (Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. H. Liddel, Strategy, 2nd ed. (New York: Meridian, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Frank, and Ben Mor, eds., Conflict in World Politics (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Err oil, Democracy and War (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, David, The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, Isabel, Absolute Destruction (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Wendy, Eroding Military Influence in Brazil (Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel,The Soldier and the State—The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris, Military Institutions and Coercion in Developing Nations (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris, The Military in the Political Development of New Nations—An Essay in Comparative Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris, and Roger Little, Sociology and the Military Establishment (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knor, Klaus, ed., Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, Joel, ed., The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebknecht, Karl, Militarism (Toronto: William Briggs, 1917).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman, Brian, For la Patria—Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America (Wilmington: SR Books, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, Robert, The Italian Navy and Fascist Expansionism 1935–1940 (London: Frank Cass, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. V., ed., The India-Pakistan Conflict (NewYork, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, Shimon, Battling for Peace—A Memoir (New York: Random House, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, Barry, The Sources of Military Doctrine, (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, James Lee, Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, Jeffrey, Revising U.S. Military Strategy—Tailoring Means to Ends (Washington DC: Pergamon, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam III, Democracies at War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Martin, Post-Military Society (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, Richard, War—Controlling Escalation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack, Myths of Empire—Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack, The Ideology of the Offensive—Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert, Principles of Sociology, Stanislav Andreski, ed. (London: Macmillan, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jay, ed., Essays on the Garrison State—Harold Lasswell (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbruner, John, The Cybernetic Theory of Decision (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Barry, Arms Races, Diplomacy, and Recurring Behavior: Lessons from Two Cases (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, David, Armaments and the Coming of War: Europe, 1904–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Brian, Politics and the Russian Army (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, Marc, History and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagts, Alfred, Defense and Diplomacy—The Soldier and the Conduct of Foreign Relations (New York: King Crown’s Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Doom, Jacques, Military Profession and Military Regimes—Commitments and Conflicts (The Hague: Mouton & Co., 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, Stephen, Causes of War—Power and the Roots of Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhanen, Tatu, Military Rule and Defense Expenditures: A Study of 119 States, 1850–1975 (Hong Kong: Asian Research Service, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani, M. S., The American Role in Pakistan, 1947–1958 (New Delhi: Radiant Publishers, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Clausewitz, Carl, On War, Michael Howard, and Peter Paret, trans. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Michael Brecher, and Sheila Moser, Crises in the Twentieth Century. Volume II: Handbook of International Crisis (New York: Pergamon, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Articles

  • Andreski, Stanislav, “On the Peaceful Disposition of Military Dictatorships,” Journal of Strategic Studies 3, no. 3 (December 1980): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, Raymond, “Remarks on Lassell’s ‘The Garrison State,’ ” Armed Forces and Society 5, no.3 (Aprill979): 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Roger, and Lewis Edinger, “Conditions for Military Control over Foreign Policy Decisions in Major States: A Historical Exploration,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 15, no.1 (March 1971): 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. Scott, “Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection,” International Studies Quarterly 50, no.2 (June 2006): 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. Scott, and Allan Stam, “The Declining Advantages of Democracy,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, no.3 (June 1998): 344–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Stephen, and Robert Zirkle, “Technology, Civil-Military Relations, and Warfare in the Developing World,” Journal of Strategic Studies 19, no.2 (June 1996): 171–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Linda, and Charles Kegley, Jr., “Bureaucratic Determinants of Foreign Policy: Some Empirical Evidence,” International Interactions 3, no.1 (January-March 1977): 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, Stuart, “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, no.2 (June 1992): 309–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Steve, “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall... Are the Freer Countries More Pacific,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28, no.4 (December 1984): 617–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Ajin, “Democratic Synergy and Victory in War,” International Studies Quarterly 48, no.3 (September 2004): 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Ajin, “The Power of Democratic Cooperation,” International Security 28, no.1 (Summer 2003): 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dassel, Kurt, “Civilians, Soldiers, and Strife: Domestic Sources of International Aggression,” International Security23, no.1 (Summer 1998): 107–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mesquita, Bueno, Bruce, and Randolph Siverson, “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability,” American Political Science Review 89, no.4 (December 1995): 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desch, Michael, “Democracy and Victory,” International Security 27, no.2 (Fall 2002): 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, Jr., Charles, “Arms Races: The Metaphor & the Facts,” National Interest 1 no.1 (Fall 1985): 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feierabend, Ivo, and Rosalind Feierabend, “Aggressive Behaviors within Politics, 1948–1962: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of ‘Conflict Resolution 10, no.3 (September 1966): 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, S. E., “The Man on Horseback-1974.” Armed Forces and Society 1, no.1 (November 1974): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, William, “Representativeness and Efficiency—Dual Problem of Civil-Military Relations,” Political Science Quarterly 76, no.3 (September 1961): 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Randolph M. Siverson, “War Expansion and War Outcome.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40, no.1 (March 1996): 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, Eric, “Democracy and the Preparation for War: Does Regime Type Affect States’ Anticipation of Casualties?” International Studies Quarterly 45, no.3 (September 2001): 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Colin, “The Urge to Compete,” World Politics 36, no.2 (January 1974): 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Colin, “Social Science and the Arms Race,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 29, no.6 (1973):23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Colin, “The Arms Race Phenomenon,” World Politics 24, no.1 (October 1971): 39–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, Joe D., “Domestic Political Systems and War Proneness,” Mershon International Studies Review 38, no.2 (October 1994): 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, Robert A., “Military Elites and Political Executives,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 14, no.1 (Spring 1986): 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, Robert, and Robin Steinback, “Military Involvement and Political Instability: An Event History Analysis 1940–1980.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 18, no.1 (Summer 1990): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Stephen, “The Power Inventory and National Strategy,” World Politics 6, no.4 (July 1954): 421–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Woosang, and James Morrow, “When Do Power Shifts Lead to War?” American Journal of Political Science 36, no.4 (November 1992): 896–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, Louis, “Consequences of Efforts at Deescalating the American-Soviet Conflict,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 14, no.2 (Fall 1986): 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned, “Windows of Opportunity—Do States Jump through Them?” International Security 9, no.1, (Summer 1984): 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng, Russell, “When Will They Ever Learn: Coercive Bargaining in Recurrent Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 27, no.3 (September 1983): 379–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepingwell, John, “The Laws of Combat? Lanchester Reexamined,” International Security 12, no.1 (Summer 1987): 89–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack, “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War,” World Politics 40, no.1 (October 1987): 82–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack, “Misperception and Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems,” World Politics 36, no.1 (October 1983): 6–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lider, Julian, “War and Politics: Clausewitz Today,” Conflict and Cooperation 12, no.3 (September, 1977): 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniruzzaman, Talukder, “Arms Transfers, Military Coups, and Military Rule in Developing States,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, no.4 (December 1992): 733–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edward, and Jack Snyder, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security 20, no.4 (Summer 1995): 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, Zeev, and Nasrin Abdolali, “Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816–1976,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33, no.1 (March 1989): 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messas, Kostas, “Democratization of Military Regimes: Contending Explanations,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 20, no.2 (Winter 1992): 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally Howard Campbell, “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35, no.2 (June 1991): 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, James D., “A Twist of Truth: A Reexamination of the Effects of Arms Races on the Occurrence of War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33, no.1 (September 1989): 500–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, Eric, “Soldiers in Mufti: The Impact of Military Rule upon Economic and Social Change in the Non-Western States,” American Political Science Review 64, no.4 (December 1970): 1131–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, James Lee, “RJ. Rummel’s Understanding Conflict and War. An Overlooked Classic?” Paper presented at the 36th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Chicago, Illinois, February 21–25, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam, “Understanding Victory—Why Institutions Matter,” International Security 28, no.1 (Summer 2003): 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam, “Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation,” American Political Science Review 97, no.2 (May 2003): 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam, “Democracy and Battlefield Military Effectiveness,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, no.3 (June 1998): 259–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Dan, and Curtis Meek, “Determinants of Military Strategy,” International Studies Quarterly 43, no.2 (June 1999): 363–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew, “Dimensions of Militarization in the Third World,” Armed Forces and Society 13, no.4 (Summer 1987): 562–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R., “Democracies Are Less Warlike than Other Regimes,” European Journal of International Relations 1, no.4 (December 1995): 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, R., “Democracies Are Less Warlike than Other Regimes, “Libertarianism and International Violence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 27, no.1 (March 1983): 27–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, Randall, “Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?” World Politics 44, no.2 (January 1992): 235–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siverson, Randolph, “Democracies and War Participation: In Defense of the Institutional Constraints Argument,” European Journal of International Relations 1, no.4 (December 1995): 481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, Melvin, and J. David Singer, “The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816–1965,” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1, no.4 (Summer 1976): 50–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, David, “Militarization and Diplomacy in Europe before 1914,” International Security 22, no.1 (Summer 1997): 125–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, Marc, “The Meaning of Mobilization in 1914,” International Security 15, no.3 (1990/1991): 120–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, Stephen, “Primed for Peace: Europe after the Cold War,” International Security 15, no.3 (Winter 1990/1991): 7–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weede, Erich, “Democracy and War Involvement,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28, no.4 (December 1984): 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Julian Schofield

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schofield, J. (2007). Introduction: Contending Views—Militarism, Militarization and War. In: Militarization and War. Initiatives in Strategic Studies: Issues and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07719-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics