<b>Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of <i>Cattleya bicolor</i> Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’</b> - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257

  • Eliane Cristina Prizão Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Letícia de Menezes Gonçalves Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Maria Auxiliadora Gutierre Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Claudete Aparecida Mangolin Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva Machado Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Palavras-chave: activated charcoal, graphite, orchids, micropropagation

Resumo

No previous studies have investigated the use of graphite instead of activated charcoal in orchids. In this work, different concentrations of activated charcoal or graphite were added to KC medium to darken the culture medium and stimulate the in vitro propagation of Cattleya bicolor and of a double hybrid orchid (‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’). The seedlings were inoculated on growth regulator-free KC medium; the effects of activated charcoal (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) and graphite (0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 g L-1) concentrations were tested separately. Each flask contained fifteen seedlings, and the experiments had a randomised, two-way factorial design. The two tested variables were culture medium and illumination levels; eleven culture levels (different concentrations of graphite or activate charcoal) and two illumination levels (14-hr photoperiod or continuous illumination) were evaluated. Three replicates of each combination were utilised. After six months of culture, the average numbers of induced buds and roots per seedling were recorded for each concentration of activated charcoal or graphite. Whereas the largest number of buds in C. bicolor seedlings occurred on media containing 6.0 or 7.5 g L-1 graphite, the largest number of roots occurred on media containing 6.0 g L-1 activated charcoal. In the hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’, the largest number of buds and roots was reported in medium with 4.5 g L-1 activated charcoal. When using graphite in place of activated charcoal, we obtained disparate the results in root formation that suggest that graphite is not a recommended substitute for activated charcoal.

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Maria de Fátima Pires da Silva Machado, Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Aossui graduação em Licenciatura Em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade de São Paulo (1978) , mestrado em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Genética) pela Universidade de São Paulo (1982) , doutorado em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Genética) pela Universidade de São Paulo (1986) e pos-doutorado pelo Instituto de Biologia Celular de Madrid C S I C (1989) . Atualmente é Professor Associado da Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Revisor de periódico da Ciência Rural e Revisor de periódico da Acta Scientiarum (UEM). Tem experiência na área de Genética , com ênfase em Genética Animal. Atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: G-3-PDH (EC 1.1.1.8), ISOENZIMAS, HIMENOPTEROS. Currículo Lattes
Publicado
2011-10-21
Como Citar
Prizão, E. C., Gonçalves, L. de M., Gutierre, M. A., Mangolin, C. A., & Machado, M. de F. P. da S. (2011). <b>Activated charcoal and graphite for the micropropagation of <i>Cattleya bicolor</i> Lindl. and a orchid double-hybrid ‘BLC Pastoral Innocence’</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 34(2), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.12257
Seção
Produção Vegetal

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

2.0
2019CiteScore
 
 
60th percentile
Powered by  Scopus