1 Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2010 Vol: 76(3):. DOI: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000300011

Desenvolvimento de prótese auditiva digital para atendimento da Portaria nº 587 (APAC) do Ministério da Saúde: Health Department

The treatment of sensorineural hearing loss is based on hearing aids, also known as individual sound amplification devices. The hearing aids purchased by the Brazilian Government, aiming at fulfilling public policies, are based on dedicated components, which bring about benefits, but also render them expensive and may impair repair services after manufacture's warranty expires. AIM: to design digital behind-the-ear hearing aids built from standardized components coming from the very supply chain of these manufacturers. STUDY DESIGN: experimental. MATERIALS AND METHODS: to identify the supply chain of these manufacturers, request samples and set up hearing aids in the laboratory. RESULTS: The developed hearing aids did not show lesser electroacoustic characteristics when compared to those acquired by the Government, also being tested by the same reference international technical standard. CONCLUSION: It is possible to develop digital behind-the-ear hearing aids based on off-the-shelf components from hearing aid manufacturers' supply chain. Their advantages include low operational costs - for acquisition (with clear advantages for the Government) and service (advantage for the patient).

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5
  1. Howarth A, Shone GR. Ageing and the auditory system. Postgrad Med J.82 , 166-71 (2006) .
  2. Fook L, Morgan R. Hearing impairment inolder people: a review. Postgrad Med J.76 , 537-41 (2000) .
  3. Lieu, J.E. Speech-language and eduacational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in chidren. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.130(5) , 524-30 (2004) .
  4. Chao, TK, Chen, THH. Cost-effectiveness of hearing aids in the hearing-impaired elderly: a probabilistic approach. Otol Neurotol.29 , 776-83 (2008) .
  5. Helvik, AS, Jacobsen G, Wennberg S, Arnesen H, Ringdahl A, Hallberg LR. Activity limitation and participation restriction in adults seeking hearing aid fitting and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil.28(5) , 281-8 (2006) .
  6. Vuorialho A, Karinen P, Sorri M. Counselling of hearing aid users is highly cost-effective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.263(11) , 988-95 (2006) .
  7. Newman CW, Hug GA, Whartin JA, Jacobson GP. The influence of hearing aid on perceived benefit in older adults. Ear Hear.14(4) , 285-9 (1993) .
  8. Franks JR, Beckmann NJ. Rejection of hearing aids: attitudes of a geriatric sample. Ear Hear.6(3) , 161-6 (1985) .
  9. Kochkin S. MarkeTrak III identifies key factors in determining consumer satisfaction. Hear J.45(8) , 1-4 (1992) .
  10. Boymans M, Goverts T, Kramer S, Festen J, Dreschler W. A prospective multi-centre study of the benefits of bilateral hearing aids. Ear Hear.29(6) , 930-41 (2008) .
  11. Erdman AS, Sedge RK. Subjective comparisons of binaural versus monaural amplification. Ear Hear.2(5) , 225-9 (1981) .
  12. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA. Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing aid seekers. Ear Hear.26(1) , 12-26 (2005) .
  13. The British Society of Hearing Aids Audiologists. Audiological provision in Europe: a public-private partnership? BSHAA , 5-20 (2005) .
  14. Upfold LJ, Wilson DA. Hearing-aid use and available aid ranges. Br J Audiol.16 , 195-201 (1982) .
  15. Batista ACM, Sampaio FM. Nível de satisfação dos idosos usuários de próteses auditivas doadas pela APAC-NAMI-UNIFOR. Revista Brasileira de Saúde.18(1) , 7-10 (2005) .
  16. Schaub A. Digital hearing aids. 1st ed. New York (NY):Thieme , (2008) .
  17. Lybarger SF. A historical overview. In: Sandlin RE. Handbook of hearing amplification. 2nd ed. v.1. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing Group;p , 17-20 (1988) .
  18. Blamey PJ. Adaptative dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants. Trends Amplif. 2005a; 9(2) , 77-98 .
  19. World Health Organization (WHO) Prevention of blindness and deafness. Guideliness for hearing aids and services for developing countries. Geneva, Switzerland;p , 10-15 (2004) .
  20. Ghemawat P. Strategy and the business landscape. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; p , 93-5 (2006) .
  21. Porter M. Estratégia competitiva - técnicas para análise da indústria e da concorrência. 2a ed. São Paulo (SP): Campus; p , 22-48 (1998) .
  22. Smedley TC, Schow RL. Problem-solving and extending the life of your hearing aids. In: Carmen R. The consumer handbook on hearing loss and hearing aids. 2ª ed. Sedona (AR): Auricle Ink Publishers;p , 151-8 (2004) .
  23. Sweetow RW. Application and fitting strategies for programmable hearing instruments. In: Sandlin RE. Handbook of hearing amplification. 2ª ed, v. 1. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing Group;p , 171-6 (1988) .
  24. Bento RF, Miniti A, Marone SAM. Tratado de otologia. 1ª ed. São Paulo (SP): EDUSP; p , 84-9 (1998) .
  25. Christensen CM. O dilema da inovação. 1ª ed. São Paulo (SP): Makron Books; XIV-XXX , (2001) .
  26. Shih HP. Technology-push and communication-pull forces driving message-based coordination performance. J Strategy Inform Syst.15 , 105-23 (2006) .
  27. Romero LC. A política de incentivos aos medicamentos genéricos no Brasil. Estudo 376 da consultoria legislativa do Senado Federal , 01-04 (2003) .
  28. Gadelha CAG, Quental C, Fialho BC. Saúde e inovação: uma abordagem sistêmica das indústrias da saúde. Cad Saúde Públic.a19(1) , 47-59 (2003) .
  29. GApreliminary data sheet. Gennum Corp., Burlington, Canada;2007 , (3226) .
  30. BRASIL. Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior. Análise das Informações de Comércio Exterior. Disponível em: Link Acessado em 30 de janeiro , (2009) .