Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the Australian Curriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The well-being of modern economies and societies is increasingly requiring citizens to possess capabilities in integrating knowledge and skills in science, technology, engineering and science to solve problems. However, by the end of schooling, the majority of Australian students show little interest in these discipline areas and have no plans to continue study or work in them; many refer to these disciplines as boring. Further, they typically have little experience in integrating knowledge and skills from these disciplines and/or in applying this to solve relevant problems. Therefore, there is a need to engage students with such learning experiences to develop their interest and capabilities, particularly during the early years of secondary schooling. This is not easy for teachers to respond to, but with the support of modern digital technologies and the new Australian curriculum, the potential is expanded and the challenge is more readily achievable. However, appropriate pedagogies need to be supported that include more authentic approaches to assessment. Learning activities need to support students to integrate knowledge and skills across discipline areas in tackling real problems, and this also needs to be reflected in how students are assessed. In this paper, I will draw on personal experience as a teacher, a review of recent literature, components of the Australian Curriculum, and findings from research projects associated with my University research centre, to argue for, and illustrate how, teachers can orchestrate powerful learning activities to promote an interdisciplinary approach to STEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2013) Australian curriculum. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2015) National Assessment Program: ICT literacy years 6 and 10—Reprot 2014. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA)

  • Becta (2006) The Becta review 2006: evidence on the progress of ICT in education. Becta ICT Research, London

  • Biagi F, Loi M (2013) Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: evidence from recent econometric studies. Eur J Educ 48(1):28–42. doi:10.1111/ejed.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackley S, Howell J (2015) A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Aust J Teach Educ 40(7):102–112. doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb I (2015) Vision for a science nation. Department of Industry and Science. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Productivity (2016) Digital disruption: What do governments need to do?. Productivity Commission, Canberra, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook SJ, Sharma MD, Wilson R (2015) Comparison of technology use between biology and physics teachers in a 1:1 laptop environment. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ 15(2):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Access Economics (2015) Australia’s digital pulse. Australian Computer Society, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Drigas AS, Pappas MA (2015) On line and other game-based learning for mathematics. Int J Online Eng 11(4):62–67. doi:10.3991/ijoe.v11i4.4742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EdTech Strategies, LLC (2015) Pencils down: the shift to online and computer-based testing. EdTech Strategies LLC, Arlington, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser BJ (1994) Research on classroom and school climate. In: Gabel D (ed) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, pp 493–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H et al (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover S, Pea R (2013) Computational thinking in K-12: a review of the state of the field. Educ Res 42(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai YB, Burke Q (2013) Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan 95(1):61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Lyons T, Quinn F (2014) The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teach Sci 60(2):34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessels U, Taconis R (2012) Alien or alike? How the perceived similarity between the typical science teacher and a student’s self-Image correlates with choosing science at school. Res Sci Educ 42(6):1049–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell R (2012) The origins and underpinning principles of e-scape. Int J Technol Des Educ 22(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei J, Zhao Y (2007) Computer uses and student achievement: a longitudinal study. Comput Educ 49(2):284–296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Dwyer F (2006) The fingertip effects of computer-based assessment in education. TechTrends 50(6):27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran R (2015) The math behind basketball’s wildest moves. http://www.ted.com/talks/rajiv_maheswaran_the_math_behind_basketball_s_wildest_moves?language=en. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Malley A (2015) Model for the modern entrepreneur. InTheBlack. Bauer Media Group, Sydney, pp 22–26

  • Mann D, Shakeshaft C, Becker J, Kottkamp R (1999) West virginia story: achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Milken Exchange on Education Technology, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters GN (2013) Reforming educational assessment: imperatives, principles and challenges. In: Mellor S (ed) Australian education review. ACER Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters GN (2015) A 21st century curriculum. [Long Reads]. Teacher. http://www.teachermagazine.com.au/geoff-masters/article/a-21st-century-curriculum. Accessed 28 Jan 2016

  • Myers A, Berkowicz J (2015a) The STEM shift. Corwin, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers A, Berkowicz J (2015b) STEM should broaden, not narrow, the curriculum. Educ Week 35(5):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse CP (2004) Portable computing supporting project-based learning. In: Au W, Li K, White B (eds) Australian computers in education conference. Australian Council for Computers in Education, Adelaide, South Australia, pp 1–5

  • Newhouse CP (2013) ICT in the Australian curriculum. In: Wong L-H, Liu C-C, Hirashima T, Sumedi P, Lukman M (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, Bali, Indonesia, pp 914–919

  • Newhouse CP (2014) Learning with portable digital devices in Australian schools: 20 years on! Aust Educ Res 41(4):471–483

  • Newhouse CP (2015) Measuring the meaningful use of ICT in schools: a learning environments attributes approach. Int J Tech Enhanced Learn 7(4):309

  • Newhouse CP, Clarkson BD (2008) Using learning environment attributes to evaluate the impact of ICT on learning in schools. Res Prac Tech Enhanced Learn 3(2):139–158

  • Newhouse CP, Lane J, Cooper M, Twining P (2014) Redefining education: sustaining 1 to 1 computing strategies in Western Australian schools. In: Urban S (ed) Australian computers in education conference. Australian Council for Computers in Education, Adelaide, Australia, pp 345–351

  • OECD (2015) Schooling redesigned: towards innovative learning systems. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Chief Scientist (2014) Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Canberra

  • Ong T (2015) Atlassian: Sydney-based tech firm becomes most successful Australian listing on US stock exchange. ABC News, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005) Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris, p 138

  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2010) Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Washington, DC

  • Prieto LP, Dimitriadis Y, Asensio-Perez JI, Looi C (2015) Orchestration in learning technology research: evaluation of a conceptual framework. Res Learn Technol 23:1–15. doi:10.3402/rlt.v23.28019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz JM, Fan S (2015) STEM and technology education: international state-of-the-art. Int J Technol Des Educ 25:429–451. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders ME (2012) Integrative stem education as best practice. In: Middleton H (ed) Explorations of best practice in technology, design, and engineering education, vol 2. Griffith Institute for Educational Research, Queensland, pp 103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • School Curriculum and Standards Authority (2015a) WACE: applied information technology syllabus—year 11. http://wace1516.scsa.wa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/10984/Applied_Information_Technology_Y11_Syllabus_ATAR_PDF.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • School Curriculum and Standards Authority (2015b). WACE: engineering studies syllabus—year 11. http://wace1516.scsa.wa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/11292/Engineering_Studies_Y11_Syllabus_ATAR_pdf2.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  • Stevenson I (2013) Does technology have an impact on learning? A fuzzy set analysis of historical data on the role of digital repertoires in shaping the outcomes of classroom pedagogy. Comput Educ 69:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoilescu D (2015) A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology. J Educ Comput Res 52(4):514–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Australian Industry Group (2015) Progressing STEM skills in Australia. The Australian Industry Group, Sydney, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education (2013) Expanding evidence approaches for learning in a digital world. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing J (2011) Research notebook: computational thinking—What and why? In: The link magazine, spring, vol 6.0. pp 20–23

  • World Economic Forum (2016) The future of jobs: employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, pp 1–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Schooling and Learning Technologies (CSaLT), School of Education, Edith Cowan University, 2 Bradford St, Mount Lawley, WA, 6050, Australia

    Christopher Paul Newhouse

Authors
  1. Christopher Paul Newhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Paul Newhouse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Newhouse, C.P. STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the Australian Curriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment. J Sci Educ Technol 26, 44–57 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation