Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Co-Parenting Scale for Dissolved Relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instruments that assess parenting behavior after divorce have largely focused on the domains of general support of and conflict in co-parenting. This paper introduces and validates a measurement tool that provides a more nuanced perspective of the quality of co-parenting behaviors, the Multidimensional Co-Parenting Scale for Dissolved Relationships (MCS-DR). Participants were divorced or currently divorcing parents recruited through a Qualtrics panel (N = 569) to take a university-sponsored, state-approved curriculum, “Successful Co-Parenting After Divorce” and respond to a series of surveys about their experiences in the divorce process. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify the underlying factor structure of the initial measurement item pool, which consisted of 48 items. From this, a four factor model emerged, consisting of 23 items; one additional item was removed following tests of measurement equivalence as a function of gender suggesting a final measure which consisted of 22 items across the four subscales. Those subscales include: Overt Conflict, Support, Self-Controlled Covert Conflict, and Externally-Controlled Covert Conflict. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four factor structure of the MCS-DR. The dimensions of Support and Overt Conflict demonstrate concurrent validity with an existing measure used in the literature on post-divorce co-parenting. Educators and clinicians may find this newly developed scale useful in helping parents identify their strengths and challenges in post-divorce functioning for the well-being of their children. Implications for the field are also discussed in relation to legislatively and judicially mandated divorce classes in many states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamsons, K., & Pasley, K. (2006). Coparenting following divorce and relationship dissolution. In M. A. Fine & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), The handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (pp. 241–261). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R. (1981). The continuing coparental relationship between divorced spouses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 415–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R. (1983). Predictors of paternal involvement postdivorce: mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions. Journal of Divorce, 6(3), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R. (1994). The good divorce: keeping your family together when your marriage comes apart. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R. (2007). Family ties after divorce: long-term implications for children. Family Process, 46, 53–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrons, C. R., & Rodgers, R. H. (1987). Divorced families: meeting the challenges of divorce and remarriage. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, B. L., & McKenzie, B. (2004). Parent education after separation/divorce: impact of the level of parental conflict on outcomes. Family Court Review, 42, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, N. (2004). Typology of post-divorce parental relationships and behaviors. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 41, 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmeyer, J. J., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (2014). Postdivorce coparenting typologies and children’s adjustment. Family Relations, 63, 526–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmeyer, J. J., Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., & Markham, M. (2017). Experiences with coparenting scale: a semantic differential measure of postdivorce coparenting satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1471–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögels, S. M., Hellemans, J., van Deursen, S., Römer, M., & van der Meulen, R. (2014). Mindful parenting in mental health care: effects on parental and child psychopathology, parental stress, parenting, coparenting, and marital functioning. Mindfulness, 5, 536–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P. (1971). Divorce and after: an analysis of the emotional and social problems of divorce.Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonach, K. (2005). Factors contributing to quality coparenting. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 43, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonach, K., Sales, E., & Koeske, G. (2005). Gender differences in perceptions of coparenting quality among expartners. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 43, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62, 1008–1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., Krishnakumar, A., Stone, G., Anthony, C., Pemberton, S., Gerard, J., & Barber, B. K. (1998). Interparental conflict styles and youth problem behaviors: a two-sample replication study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., & Trotter, B. B. (1990). Nonresidential and residential parents’ perceptions of the former spouse relationship and children’s social competence following marital separation: theory and programmed intervention. Family Relations, 39, 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. F., Goddard, H. W. (2011). Family life education: principles and practices for effective outreach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. J. (2015). The vital role of measurement equivalence in family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, R. E. (2012). Renegotiating family relationships: divorce, child custody, and mediationNew York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCaullum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favez, N., Widmer, E. D., Doan, M., & Tissot, H. (2015). Coparenting in stepfamilies: maternal promotion of family cohesiveness with partner and with father. Journal of Child and family Studies, 24, 3268–3278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: a framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3, 95–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 12, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi-Dottan, R., & Cohen, O. (2014). Predictors of parental communication and cooperation among divorcing spouses. Journal of Child and family Studies, 23, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. R., Rycraft, J. R., & Jordan, T. (2014). An innovative approach to improving father-child relationships for fathers who are noncompliant with child support payments: a mixed methods evaluation. Journal of Adolescent and Family Health, 6(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., Markham, M., & Rothrauff, T. (2011). Predicting postdivorce coparental communication. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 52, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geasler, M. J., & Blaisure, K. R. (1998). A review of divorce education program materials. Family Relations, 47, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J. (1981). Relationships between former spouses: descriptive findings. Journal of Divorce, 4(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grych, J. H. (2005). Interparental conflict as a risk factor for child maladjustment: implications for the development of preventions programs. Family Court Review, 43, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, K., & Pasley, K. (2005). Conditions affecting the association between father identity and father involvement. Fathering, 3, 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., & Mosher, S. W. (1992). The perceived stress scale: factor structure and relation to depression symptoms in a psychiatric sample. Journal of psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14, 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E. (2010). How do fathers influence children’s development? Let me count the ways. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. 5th ed (pp. 1–26). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden-Derdich, D. A., Estrada, A. U., Updegraff, K. A., & Leonard, S. A. (2002). The boundary violations scale: an empirical measure of intergenerational boundary violations in families. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 241–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, G., Gordis, E. B., & John, R. S. (2001). Coparenting: a link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 3–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masheter, C. (1997). Healthy and unhealthy friendship and hostility between ex-spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, B. T., Teti, D. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2017). Assessing coparenting relationships in daily life: the daily coparenting scale (D-Cop). Journal of Child and family Studies, 26, 2396–2411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. P. (1997). Overt and covert coparenting processes in the family. Family Process, 36, 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, K. A., & Gamble, W. C. (2012). Associations among marital qualities, supportive and undermining coparenting, and parenting self-efficacy: testing spillover and stress-buffering processes. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 510–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, M. I., Hines, D. A., Mahmood, S., & Córdova, J. V. (2010). Pathways between marriage and parenting for wives and husbands: the role of coparenting. Family Process, 49, 59–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mullett, E. K., & Stolberg, A. (1999). The development of the co-parenting behaviors questionnaire: an instrument for children of divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 31, 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. E., Jacobvitz, D. B., & Hazen, N. L. (2016). What’s so bad about competitive coparenting? Family-level predictors of children’s externalizing symptoms. Journal of Child and family Studies, 25, 1684–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mytton, J., Ingram, J., Manns, S., & Thomas, J. (2014). Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: a qualitative systematic review. Health Education & Behavior, 41(2), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9 (11). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=11

  • Parent, J., & Forehand, R. (2017). The multidimensional assessment of parenting scale (MAPS): development and psychometric properties. Journal of Child and family Studies, 26, 2136–2151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, S. L., & Lombreglia, M. (2008). A nationwide survey of mandatory parent education. Family Court Review, 46, 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. T., Beckmeyer, J. J., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. (2015). Perceived barriers to postdivorce coparenting: differences between men and women and associations with coparenting behaviors. Family Relations, 65, 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, V. L., & Braver, S. L. (1996). Gender differences in satisfaction with divorce settlements. Family Relations, 15, 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toews, M. L., & McKenry, P. C. (2001). Court-related predictors of parental cooperation and conflict after divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 35, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Egeren, L. A. (2001). Le rôle du père au sein du partenariat parental (The father’s role in the coparenting relationship). Santé mentale au Québec, 26, 134–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Egeren, L. A., & Hawkins, D. P. (2004). Coming to terms with coparenting: implications of definition and measurement. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vareschi, C. G., & Bursik, K. (2005). Attachment style differences in the parental interactions and adaption patterns of divorcing parents. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 42, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, M. F. (1989). Family rituals as a key to kinship connections in remarried families. Family Relations, 38, 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Vandermark Foundation (Grant #F08067).

Author Contributions

AJF assisted in the development of the measure, assisted in the collection of data, conducted analyses, and contributed in writing all parts of the manuscript. MLG assisted in the development of the measure, contributed in writing all parts of the manuscript, and edited the manuscript. KOassisted in the collection of data, contributed in writing the literature review and discussion, and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony J. Ferraro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Florida State University Institutional Review Board provided approval for the study.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferraro, A.J., Lucier-Greer, M. & Oehme, K. Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Co-Parenting Scale for Dissolved Relationships. J Child Fam Stud 27, 2780–2796 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1124-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1124-2

Keywords

Navigation