Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to evidence the shortcomings of large-scale assessments and the new shift toward capability-oriented indicators. Focusing on the international data on adult skills (PIAAC) and its impact in forging VET (vocational education and training) policies, we assume that current VET systems are confronted with many challenges that arise from the interaction of two sources. On one hand, VET policy focuses mainly on employability which is insufficient to grasp wider benefits that education entails – as postulated by many educational (i.e., Nussbaum, Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2011; Boni and Walker, Universities and global human development: Theoretical and empirical insights for social change. Routledge, London, 2016) and a considerable smaller education and work scholars (i.e., McGrath and Powell, Int J Educ Dev 50:12–19, 2016; Egdell and McQuaid, Soc Policy Adm 50:1–18, 2016). On the other hand, the underpinnings of the objectives and designs of VET should adapt to the socioeconomic consequences of the Great Recession. The chapter focuses on the PIAAC and most concretely to the Spanish case as an example of how the Great Recession becomes an open license to fast- and short-term strategies that favors employment regardless of its quality and long-term consequences and valuates education and youth role in society in relation to their contribution to boost the economy. The chapter recognizes the urge for seeking fast solutions that shift the unemployment rates but alerts to the overlooked aspects with some of those measures in relation to VET. In fact, this chapter is a call to policy-makers and academics toward the importance of rethinking education on the basis of new information basis of judgment that are human-centered.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Barnett A (2011) The long and the quick of revolution. Open Democracy. Retrieved 28 Mar 2014, from http://www.opendemocracy.net/anthony-barnett/long-and-quick-of-revolution
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth. McGraw-Hill, New York
Boni A, Walker M (2016) Universities and global human development: theoretical and empirical insights for social change. Routledge, London
Bonvin J-M (2012) Individual working lives and collective action. An introduction to capability for work and capability for voice. Tran Eur Rev Labour Res 18(1):9–18
Bonvin J-M, Farvaque N (2004) Towards a capability-friendly social policy, the role of local implementing agencies. In: Deneulin S, Nebel M, Sagowsky N (eds) Capabilities and justice, towards transforming structures. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht
Brighouse H, Swift A (2003) Defending liberalism in education theory. J Educ Policy 18(4): 355–373
Brunner R, Watson N (2015) What can the capabilities approach add to policy analysis in high-income countries. What Works Scotland. Working Paper
Calero J, Choi Á (2017) The distribution of skills among the European adult population and unemployment: a comparative approach. Eur J Educ 52(3):348–364
Crocker DA (2008) Ethics of global development: agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De la Fuente A, Doménech R (2014) Educational attainment in the OECD, 1960–2010, 3.1. FEDEA, Documento de Trabajo 2014-14
Desrosières A (2002) The politics of large numbers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Desrosières A (2008) La statistique, outil de gouvernement et outil de preuve. L’argument Statistique I: Pour Une Sociologie Historique de La Quantification. pp 7–20
EC (2014) Education, adult skills and social outcomes empirical evidence from the survey on adult skills (PIAAC 2013). http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC89591/skills_social_outcomes_piaac_final_version_pubsy.pdf
Egdell V, McQuaid R (2016) Supporting disadvantaged young people into work: insights from the capability approach. Soc Policy Adm 50(1):1–18
Espeland W, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity. Am J Sociol 113(1):1–40
Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration.pdf. Annu Rev Sociol 24:313–343
European Commission (2012) Vocational education and training for better skills, growth and jobs. European Commission, Brussels, pp 1–4
Felgueroso F (2016) Lifelong learning in Spain: a challenge for the future, studies on the Spanish economy eee2016-08, FEDEA
Fukuda-Parr S, Yamin A, Greenstein J (2014) The power of numbers: a critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. J Hum Dev Capabilities 15(2–3):105–117
Gebhardt E, Adams RJ (2007) The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA. J Appl Meas 8(3):305–322
Goldstein H (2004) International comparisons of student attainment: some issues arising from the PISA study. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 11(3):319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304618
Goldstein H (2015) Rasch measurement: a response to Payanides, Robinson and Tymms. Br Educ Res J 41(1):176–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3170
Grek S (2009) Governing by numbers: the PISA “effect” in Europe. J Educ Policy 24:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
Grek S (2010) International organisations and the shared construction of policy “Problems”: problematisation and change in education governance in Europe. Eur Educ Res J 9(3):396. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.396
Gustafsson JE (2016) Lasting effects of quality of schooling: evidence from PISA and PIAAC. Intelligence 57:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.05.004
Hacking I (1999) The social construction of what? History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hanushek EA, Wößmann L (2008) The role of cognitive skills in economic development. J Econ Lit 46(3):607–668. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607
Hanushek EA, Schwerdt G, Wiederhold S, Woessmann L (2015) Returns to skills around the world: evidence from PIAAC. Eur Econ Rev 73:103–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.006
Ibrahim SS (2011) From individual to collective capabilities: the capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. J Hum Dev 7(3):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600815982
Isphording IE (2014) Disadvantages of linguistic origin – evidence from immigrant literacy scores. Econ Lett 123(2):236–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.02.013
Kirsch I, Lennon M (2017) PIAAC: a new design for a new era. Large Scale Assess Educ IEA-ETS Res Inst J 5(11):2–22
Kirsch I, Lennon M, von Davier M, Gonzalez E, Yamamoto K (2013) On the growing importance of international large-scale assessments. In: von Davier M, Gonzalez E, Kirsch I, Yamamoto K (eds) The role of international large-scale assessments: perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. Springer, New York
LOMCE (2013) Ley Orgánica Para La Mejora de La Calidad Educativa (LOMCE). Retrieved 15 May 2014, from: http://www.mecd.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/participacion-publica/lomce.html
McGrath S (2012) Building new approaches to thinking about vocational education and training and development: policy, theory and evidence. Int J Educ Dev 32(5):619–622
McGrath S, Powell L (2016) Skills for sustainable development: transforming vocational education and training beyond 2015. Int J Educ Dev 50:12–19
MEDC (2013) PIAAC Programa Internacional para la Evaluación de las Competencias de la población adulta. 2013, Informe Español, Volumen I: Análisis Secundario. MECD, Madrid
Meyer H-D, Benavot A (2013) PISA, power, and policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Symposium Books, Oxford
Mundy K, Green A, Lingard B, Verger A (2016) Introduction: the globalization of education policy – key approaches and debates. In: dies (ed) The handbook of global education policy. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–20
Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
OECD (2000) Literacy in the information age. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/41529765.pdf
OECD (2012) Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments: framework for the OECD survey of adult skills, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en
OECD (2013a) Skilled for life? Key findings from the survey of adult skills. pp 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204027-en
OECD (2013b) Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). OECD Publishing, Paris
OECD (2017) Estudios Económicos de la OCDE. España. March 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Spain-2017-OECD-economic-survey-overview-spanish.pdf
Oreopoulos P, Salvanes KG (2011) Priceless: the nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. J Econ Perspect 25(1):159–184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.1.159
Powell L, McGrath S (2014) Exploring the value of the capability approach for vocational education and training evaluation: reflections from South Africa. In: Carbonnier G, Carton M, King K (eds) Education, learning, training: critical issues for development, International development policy series No. 5, Vol. in press. Brill-Nijhoff, Boston, pp 126–148
Robeyns I (2003) Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Fem Econ 9(2–3):61–92
Robeyns I (2005) The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J Hum Dev Capab 6(1):93–117
Scandurra R, Calero J (2017) Modelling adult skills in OECD countries. Br Educ Res J 43(4): 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3290
Schleicher A (2008) PIAAC: a new strategy for assessing adult competencies. Int Rev Educ 54(5/6):627–650
Sen A (1982) Equality of what. In: Sen A (ed) Choice, welfare and measurement. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 353–369
Sen A (1990) Justice: means versus freedoms. Philos Public Aff 19(2):111–121
Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 30–53
Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Stiglitz JE (2008) Global crisis – made in America. Spiegel Online. 2008. http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/joseph-e-stiglitz-global-crisis-made-in-america-a-590028.html
Svend K (2011) Is the foundation under PISA solid? A critical look at the scaling model underlying international comparisons of student attainment. Copenhagen. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265807277_Is_the_foundation_under_PISA_solid_A_critical_look_at_the_scaling_model_underlying_international_comparisons_of_student_attainment
Tikly LP, Barrett AM (2011) Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. Int J Educ Dev 31(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.001
Unterhalter E (2017) Negative capability? Measuring the unmeasurable in education. Comp Educ 53(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1254945
Valiente Ó, Scandurra R (2015) Educació postobligatòria i desigualtat de competències entre els joves. In: Valiente Ó, Capsada-Munsech Q (eds) Els reptes en matèria de competències de la població adulta. Fundació Jaume Bofill, Barcelona, pp 25–73
Walker M, Unterhalter E (2007) Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Appendix
Appendix
Determinants of Social Goals. Reference is Spain. PIAAC 2012, Population Aged 25–65 years
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Social trust | Political efficacy | Cultural engagement | Numeracy | Literacy |
Age | 0.00301 | −0.00623 | 0.0717*** | 1.346 | 0.437 |
(0.0231) | (0.0200) | (0.0205) | (1.091) | (1.035) | |
Age2 | 0.000976 | 0.00237 | −0.00196 | −0.247*** | −0.223*** |
(0.00173) | (0.00153) | (0.00165) | (0.0820) | (0.0773) | |
Female | 0.0722*** | 0.0691*** | 0.0456*** | −14.51*** | −3.361*** |
(0.0178) | (0.0207) | (0.0166) | (0.720) | (0.673) | |
Immigrant | 0.0491* | −0.0523* | −0.0260 | −26.77*** | −27.47*** |
(0.0287) | (0.0270) | (0.0238) | (1.738) | (1.450) | |
Hi. Parental Ed. | 0.148*** | 0.0914*** | 0.126*** | 8.421*** | 9.108*** |
(0.0147) | (0.0135) | (0.0114) | (0.594) | (0.507) | |
Ed. Upp. Sec. Gen | 0.115*** | 0.0344 | 0.0376 | 9.929*** | 11.52*** |
(0.0373) | (0.0239) | (0.0268) | (1.309) | (1.162) | |
Ed. Upp. Sec. Voc | −0.0611** | −0.0252 | 0.0343 | 17.13*** | 10.81*** |
(0.0298) | (0.0205) | (0.0251) | (1.141) | (1.028) | |
Ed. tertiary | 0.241*** | 0.233*** | 0.152*** | 36.43*** | 31.92*** |
(0.0303) | (0.0265) | (0.0301) | (1.173) | (1.066) | |
Numeracy | 0.00161*** | 0.00155*** | 0.00106*** | ||
(0.000231) | (0.000233) | (0.000184) | |||
Not employed | −0.0446 | −0.0449** | −0.0196 | −7.647*** | −4.727*** |
(0.0276) | (0.0208) | (0.0281) | (0.991) | (0.998) | |
Skilled | 0.267*** | 0.188*** | 0.220*** | 32.70*** | 27.74*** |
(0.0375) | (0.0379) | (0.0381) | (1.375) | (1.245) | |
White collar | 0.134*** | 0.0465 | 0.120*** | 20.06*** | 17.22*** |
(0.0413) | (0.0307) | (0.0344) | (1.406) | (1.230) | |
Blue collar | 0.00666 | 0.00973 | 0.0370 | 10.98*** | 7.903*** |
(0.0426) | (0.0328) | (0.0364) | (1.566) | (1.329) | |
OECD | 0.309*** | −0.133*** | 0.235*** | 5.696*** | 10.10*** |
(0.0272) | (0.0249) | (0.0206) | (1.041) | (0.992) | |
Constant | 1.387*** | 1.542*** | 0.383*** | 218.7*** | 225.4*** |
(0.102) | (0.0927) | (0.0811) | (3.898) | (3.727) | |
R2 | 0.0665 | 0.0518 | 0.0515 | 0.307 | 0.319 |
Observations | 97,382 | 97,670 | 97,788 | 97,820 | 97,820 |
Determinants of Social Goals. Reference is Spain. PIAAC 2012, Population Aged 15–65 years
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Social trust | Political efficacy | Cultural engagement | Numeracy | Literacy |
Age | −0.0587*** | −0.0426*** | −0.0871*** | 0.174 | −1.038 |
(0.0166) | (0.0133) | (0.0153) | (0.753) | (0.725) | |
Age2 | 0.00533*** | 0.00504*** | 0.00960*** | −0.163*** | −0.118** |
(0.00134) | (0.00114) | (0.00130) | (0.0609) | (0.0588) | |
Female | 0.0607*** | 0.0420** | 0.0285* | −14.27*** | −3.430*** |
(0.0176) | (0.0194) | (0.0168) | (0.743) | (0.690) | |
Immigrant | 0.0720*** | −0.0673*** | −0.00874 | −25.29*** | −25.75*** |
(0.0244) | (0.0258) | (0.0231) | (1.719) | (1.421) | |
Hi. Parental Ed. | 0.146*** | 0.0978*** | 0.142*** | 9.240*** | 9.626*** |
(0.0138) | (0.0129) | (0.0114) | (0.582) | (0.498) | |
Ed. Upp. Sec. Gen | 0.107*** | 0.0364* | 0.00575 | 12.28*** | 13.06*** |
(0.0343) | (0.0216) | (0.0234) | (1.202) | (1.093) | |
Ed. Upp. Sec. Voc | −0.0866*** | −0.0415** | −0.0236 | 16.79*** | 10.35*** |
(0.0286) | (0.0199) | (0.0238) | (1.096) | (1.003) | |
Ed. tertiary | 0.212*** | 0.224*** | 0.104*** | 36.29*** | 31.71*** |
(0.0274) | (0.0230) | (0.0261) | (1.102) | (0.960) | |
Numeracy | 0.00178*** | 0.00165*** | 0.00107*** | ||
(0.000211) | (0.000219) | (0.000183) | |||
Not employed | −0.0158 | −0.0379** | −0.00837 | −5.043*** | −2.230** |
(0.0224) | (0.0184) | (0.0225) | (0.855) | (0.888) | |
Skilled | 0.237*** | 0.148*** | 0.181*** | 30.20*** | 25.74*** |
(0.0381) | (0.0360) | (0.0367) | (1.583) | (1.365) | |
White collar | 0.116*** | 0.00971 | 0.0894*** | 18.14*** | 15.77*** |
(0.0361) | (0.0283) | (0.0308) | (1.479) | (1.212) | |
Blue collar | −0.0251 | −0.0297 | −0.00776 | 9.003*** | 6.243*** |
(0.0414) | (0.0329) | (0.0321) | (1.538) | (1.341) | |
OECD | 0.324*** | −0.125*** | 0.256*** | 5.677*** | 10.41*** |
(0.0258) | (0.0240) | (0.0205) | (0.985) | (0.949) | |
Constant | 1.570*** | 1.664*** | 0.898*** | 221.9*** | 229.8*** |
(0.0825) | (0.0718) | (0.0790) | (2.299) | (2.384) | |
R2 | 0.0617 | 0.0495 | 0.0463 | 0.285 | 0.300 |
Observations | 8260 | 8279 | 8287 | 8290 | 8290 |
Descriptive Statistics
OECD | Spain | |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
25–29 | 15.77 | 13.60 |
30–34 | 15.77 | 16.30 |
35–39 | 16.61 | 18.54 |
40–44 | 17.17 | 18.44 |
45–49 | 17.71 | 17.94 |
50–54 | 16.97 | 15.19 |
Missing | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Female | ||
Male | 47.01 | 48.86 |
Female | 52.99 | 51.14 |
Missing | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Immigration status | ||
Native or 2nd generation immigrants or one foreign-born parent | 85.50 | 85.70 |
1st generation immigrants | 14.50 | 14.30 |
Missing | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Highest level of education attainment | ||
Secondary or below | 18.20 | 43.64 |
Upper secondary gen | 14.36 | 17.38 |
Upper secondary voc | 24.44 | 2.47 |
Tertiary | 41.73 | 35.22 |
Missing | 1.27 | 1.29 |
Highest of mother or father’s level of education | ||
Neither parent has attained upper secondary | 29.28 | 69.80 |
At least one parent has attained secondary and postsecondary, non-tertiary | 38.76 | 13.98 |
At least one parent has attained tertiary | 25.02 | 12.01 |
Missing | 6.93 | 4.21 |
Employment status | ||
Not employed | 80.19 | 67.99 |
Employed | 18.55 | 30.68 |
Missing | 1.26 | 1.34 |
Occupational classification of respondent’s job (ISCO), last | ||
Skilled occupations | 41.82 | 26.79 |
Semiskilled white-collar occupations | 23.90 | 28.38 |
Semiskilled blue-collar occupations | 17.40 | 19.02 |
Elementary occupations | 6.63 | 14.13 |
Missing | 10.24 | 11.68 |
About yourself – political efficacy – no influence on the government | ||
Strongly agree | 19.68 | 34.51 |
Agree | 26.37 | 25.66 |
Neither agree nor disagree | 19.19 | 15.09 |
Disagree | 25.99 | 17.28 |
Strongly disagree | 6.89 | 5.65 |
Missing | 1.88 | 1.82 |
About yourself – social trust – trust only few people | ||
Strongly agree | 24.50 | 28.30 |
Agree | 42.23 | 38.65 |
Neither agree nor disagree | 10.50 | 10.52 |
Disagree | 16.93 | 17.66 |
Strongly disagree | 4.37 | 3.53 |
Missing | 1.46 | 1.34 |
About yourself – cultural engagement – voluntary work for non-profit organization | ||
Never | 61.72 | 80.75 |
Less than once a month | 17.97 | 8.38 |
Less than once a week but at least once a month | 9.20 | 4.31 |
At least once a week but not every day | 8.21 | 3.71 |
Every day | 1.63 | 1.64 |
Missing | 1.28 | 1.21 |
Descriptive Statistics of the Social Outcomes
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lopez-Fogues, A., Scandurra, R. (2018). Analyzing PIAAC Through the Capability Approach. In: McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, J., Suart, R. (eds) Handbook of Vocational Education and Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_3-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_3-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49789-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49789-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education