Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trait

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

  • 129 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152. doi:10.1177/1088868314523838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bleidorn, W. (2015). What accounts for personality maturation in early adulthood? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., Burns, G. N., Stewart, S. M., & Gruys, M. L. (2011). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as moderators of the relationship between neuroticism and counterproductive work behaviors: A constructive replication. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 320–330. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00561.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1303–1331. doi:10.1037/a0037091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T. (2008). Toward a “molecular psychology” of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 311–327). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ching, C. M., Zhang, H., Shen, J., Arias, R. M., et al. (2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922–935. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor model (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odesa: Psychological Assessment Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.1011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2009). In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 150–154. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Forthingly Review, 36, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 163–179). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., Thiel, W., & Angleitner, A. (2010). Sources of cumulative continuity in personality: A longitudinal multiple-rater twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 995–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, Z., Hutteman, R., Denissen, J. J., Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. (2016). Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.03.004

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 847–861. doi:10.1037/a0024298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2006). Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1100–1113. doi:10.1177/0146167206288488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2000). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehl, M. R., Gosling, S. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro III, A. (2003). Modeling intraindividual change in personality traits: Findings from the normative aging study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U., Robins, R. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1271–1288. doi:10.1037/a0025558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Smith, J. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 166–184. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, volume II: Special fields and applications (pp. 883–947). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1037/pspp0000096

  • Soto, C. J., & Tackett, J. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 358–362. doi:10.1177/0963721415589345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355–380. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker, A. L., Deković, M., Asscher, J., & Prinzie, P. (2014). Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 736–750. doi:10.1037/a0037248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., Ram, N., Smith, J., & Gerstorf, D. (2016). Personality trait development at the end of life: Antecedents and correlates of mean-level trajectories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 411–429. doi:10.1037/pspp0000071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 413–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarkoni, T. (2015). Neurobiological substrates of personality: A critical overview. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 61–83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (2015). Moderating effect of self-determination in the relationship between big five personality and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 385–389. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA

    Jennifer McDonald & Tera Letzring

Authors
  1. Jennifer McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tera Letzring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer McDonald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA

    Ashton Southard

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

McDonald, J., Letzring, T. (2017). Trait. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1272-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1272-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation